News

Total Records: 4476 | Pages: 448
< backward 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | forward >{ next 10 >>

Virtual Nurses in a Virtual ICU?

If you want to know what the ICU of the future will be like, think of an extremely ill patient connected to myriad tubes and monitors; watched by cameras; every sigh, snore, or change in breath sound picked up by an audio feed.

Then remove the patient, leaving just monitors, speakers, and video screens.

The ICU—or virtual ICU (vICU, also sometimes called eICU)—may be hundreds of miles away from the patients, located in an office building like any other, with nurses and physicians seated in front of banks of flat-panel screens, monitoring patients from a number of facilities or across a large hospital system.

In a session presented at the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses National Teaching Institute in New Orleans last week, Margie Fortino, MSN, RN, operations director of the Penn E-lert eICU at the University of Pennsylvania Health System, explained how vICUs (or eICUs) are being used not only to bring the resources and expert care of experienced specialists to rural facilities, but also in large medical centers to increase safe outcomes. The premise is that “an extra pair of eyes”—even though they may be many miles away—can catch patient problems earlier, especially during shifts where staffing may be leaner.

Fortino noted that a vICU nurse may watch 40 screens—more on the night shift—and use live audio and video to “assess” a patient when something triggers an alarm. The nurse can then alert the actual hospital nurse responsible for the patient. Often, a physician will also work the night shift in a vICU, acting as the “on-call” physician available to diagnose and order medical interventions—which are then implemented by the bedside health care providers. Initial data show promising results, with earlier interventions leading to decreased length of stay in ICU and reduced costs. Impressive, to be sure.

This technology may allow nurses who may not be able to physically work at the bedside to continue to use their knowledge and experience. And I’m all for technology that increases safety in health care.

But I can’t help wondering: wouldn’t better nurse-staffing ratios also provide that “extra pair of eyes”? How much money spent on the new technologies hailed in many health care reform plans could be spent providing adequate staffing? We already have plenty of data showing that increasing nurse staffing leads to better patient outcomes. When will people get excited about solving the problems that are right in front of them?

Copyright American Journal of Nursing Tuesday 20th October 2009 09:40

Source: http://ajnoffthecharts.wordpress.com/2009/05/22/virtual-nurses-in-a-virtual-icu-will-technology-trump-staffing/


Nurses calling for safer staffing

Four out of 10 nurses say staff shortages compromise patient care at least once a week, according to the Royal College of Nurses. An RCN manifesto to all the political parties says NHS employers must assure themselves they have safe staff levels. The RCN, whose survey covers the views of 9,000 nurses, is warning against job cuts due to possible reduced funding. NHS trusts said managers were increasingly examining their workforces to best use the skills of their staff.

The RCN has issued its 2009 Employment Survey which covers the views of 9,000 nurses. It shows that more than half (55%) say they are too busy to provide the level of care they would like. Almost two thirds (67%) consider their workload is too heavy. And nurses say they are looking after more patients on the wards.

Dr Peter Carter, head of the RCN, said staff were concerned that they were delivering the basics but were unable to provide the full range of quality care they would like. He said: "Nurses and healthcare assistants feel up against it, worn down and exhausted by the pressure to make efficiencies and frustrated by being prevented from delivering the quality of care they want to be providing."

The RCN are also warning of a shortfall in the number of nurses in coming years. The RCN's Labour Market Review said about 200,000 nurses are expected to retire in the next 10 years, there will be fewer newly qualified nurses and fewer nurses moving to the UK because of restrictions on migration. The RCN says the impact of growing retirements from the profession will be felt first in the community sector where most of the nurses tend to be older.

Dr Carter said: "The nursing workforce has grown in recent years but only just enough to keep up with rising demands on healthcare. "We expect the next few years will be the most challenging for staff levels in decades. "There is considerable pressure to focus on short-term funding constraints and cut staff numbers without taking patient needs into consideration. "Policy makers must look at the workforce in conjunction with their ability to deliver high quality and safe care."

Karen Charman, head of employment services at NHS Employers which represents trusts in England, said NHS organisations certainly needed to have a clear method of working out safe staffing levels in order that patient care was not harmed. "There are a number of different ways of achieving this and we believe that this should be determined at local level," she said. "Advice from professional bodies is extremely important to help trusts ensure that clinical standards and staffing levels are right to ensure the safety of patients. "However, fixed staffing ratios do not provide the flexibility to meet differing local circumstances and care settings "Employers are increasingly examining the different roles within their workforce to best use the skills of their staff."

Copyright BBC Health News, Tuesday 20th October 2009, 09:35

Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8310766.stm


Specialist paediatric heart units face closure

Up to five units which currently provide major surgery to sick infants born with congenital heart problems will be ordered to shut down or merge with larger units after new safety standards are published this week.

The smallest units – in Oxford, Leicester, Southampton, Newcastle, Bristol and Leeds – face the greatest threat of closure, though Government sources said no decisions on individual services have yet been taken. The president of the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery (SCTS) said just "six or seven" of the current 11 units would be retained.
 
Recommendations to set such standards were made eight years ago, as part of a damning public inquiry into the deaths of dozens of babies and children at Bristol Royal Infirmary at the hands of surgeons with insufficient experience of complex surgery.

Last night charities and parents groups said they were frustrated by the amount of time it had taken to agree plans which will require a total reorganisation of the service. They urged politicians not to delay further in making controversial changes, which are likely to be fiercely fought once decisions on individual units are taken. The recommendations stem from an "urgent" review of children's heart surgery ordered by the Department of Health last year.

Leslie Hamilton, president of the SCTS and a member of the steering group which carried out the review, said the impact of their proposals would be to reduce the number of centres in England by about half. He said: "The units that exist across the country now are there because of sheer hard work, but they have always been a bit too small, and somewhat under-resourced. "There have been major changes in treatment of congenital heart disease – there is nothing now we can't tackle, but that means there is a need for bigger centres which can meet the physical demands of surgery, 24 hours a day, and have the right specialists available."

Cardiac surgery had become increasingly specialist, he said, but no surgeon could be expert in many areas at once. Currently, many surgeons were still carrying out operations in which they had little experience, he said.

He gave the example of the condition Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome, an underdevelopment of the heart, which is suffered by just 50 to 70 babies born in the UK each year. "In the past there was nothing we could do about that; now we can operate. But if every unit tries to do it, their surgeons are only doing five or so cases a year. It is not in anyone's interest to be doing so few," he said.

On Thursday, the report by the NHS Specialised Commissioning Group will recommend that surgical teams carry out at least 500 heart operations on children a year, with at least four, and preferably five surgeons at each unit, he said. Meeting the standards would reduce the total number of sites to six or seven.

Anne Keatley-Clarke, chief executive of the Children's Heart Federation, a charity made up of 22 specialist support groups, said: "Most parents whose children need open heart surgery are prepared to travel a long way to get the best. "We have known for a long time that the current system is not sustainable, and that we need fewer centres for surgeons to maintain their skill level".

While such operations would be a "once in a lifetime" experience for most families, parents wanted to ensure that regular follow-up care and monitoring remained available locally, she said.

A poll of 1,000 parents of children who have had heart surgery found 73 per cent wanted to see the number of centres reduced.

Mrs Keatley-Clarke said she was worried that politicians were frightened of tackling the problem, in case it was unpopular with those who believed it was being done to save money. In fact, the changes were urgent, for reasons of safety, she said. "At the moment our helpline gets calls from parents because their child's operation has been cancelled three or four times, because there isn't enough intensive care backup," she said.

The federation will write to health secretary Andy Burnham this week, asking him to prioritise changes which could bring political difficulties. The removal of specialist services could have a knock-on effect, threatening the viability of routine hospital services more regularly used by local populations.

The largest specialist paediatric heart surgery units, at Great Ormond Street and Royal Brompton Hospital in London, and Birmingham Children's Hospital, currently carry out more than 400 operations a year. Alder Hey Hospital in Liverpool and Evelina Hospital, part of Guys and St Thomas' Foundation trust in London, carry out between 350 and 400.

The threat of closure looms largest over units at John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford, and Glenfield Hospital in Leicester, which both carry out fewer than 140 operations a year and at Southampton General Hospital, which carries out 230 operations. Bristol Royal Infirmary's unit, which does 285 procedures a year, is also vulnerable. In the North, Leeds General Infirmary and Freeman Hospital in Newcastle, which both currently do about 290 procedures, are likely to compete to stay open. However, the Department of Health group carrying out the review has yet to establish which hospitals could take on a major expansion of their services, or to carry out analysis of transport links across England, which may favour some hospitals over others.

Copyright The Sunday Telegraph, London (UK), Tuesday 20th October 2009 09:27

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/6359356/Half-of-specialist-heart-units-for-children-face-closure-under-radical-Government-plans.html


Egg screening 'ups IVF success'

A screening technique can double the chance of IVF success, giving hope to tens of thousands of women struggling to have children, say experts. Doctors at an annual US fertility meeting heard for the second year running of the merits of a test that screens embryos for genetic faults. So far more than 20 babies have been born using the technique. The UK researchers say they are now able to back the method with "great confidence". They hope it will eventually be available to all. Currently, it is offered in a few private UK clinics.

Doctors believe the £2,000 test, called comparative genomic hybridisation or CGH, will be particularly useful to older women, whose embryos have a greater risk of carrying genetic errors that cause conditions like Down's syndrome. The screening checks chromosomes in the developing embryo when it is a few days old, meaning only those embryos with the best chance of success are used in fertility treatment.

Dr Dagan Wells from Oxford University, who led the study, described the latest results on 115 women - six times as many as last year - as "astonishing". The results are particularly impressive as many of the women were on their "last chance" at IVF - they were typically aged 39 with two failed IVF cycles behind them. In total, 66% of the women fell pregnant after screening - more than double the number (28%) who typically fall pregnant without it.

Dr Wells told the American Society of Reproductive Medicine's annual conference: "We were taken aback by the impact it had on the success rates. "I think it's at the point now that we can say with great confidence that we are seeing a positive effect of this."

Around 37,00 women undergo IVF every year in the UK and less than one in four of these procedures is successful.

Allan Pacey of the British Fertility Society said: "Embryology is really crying out for something like this. "We really haven't moved on from the science of just looking down the microscope and seeing if an embryo looks good on the basis of some rather loose criteria."

Susan Seenan, from Infertility Network UK, said: "We welcome all new research which may ultimately improve the success rates of IVF for patients. "Although this is still in very early stages, it could be of great benefit to older women whose chances of success with IVF treatment is lower and it is also welcome given the move towards single embryo transfer in the UK and the lack of NHS funding which often, unfairly, means that patients are being denied access to the three cycles which the NICE guidance recommended in 2004. "Improvements in success rates are always important but even more so where patients are receiving only one, or in some cases, no NHS cycles, and we look forward to seeing if further research confirms these results."

Copyright BBC Health News Tuesday 20th October 2009 09:24

Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8313822.stm


Former nurses urged to re-register

A possible shortage of nurses and midwives caused by another swine flu outbreak has prompted the Scottish government to offer to pay former nurses £100 to re-register.

The money would cover the £76 registration fee and £23 cost of a disclosure check.

The Nursing and Midwifery Council has already written to 9,500 former nurses whose registrations have lapsed in the last four years, urging them to renew them.

Health secretary Nicola Sturgeon said: “We are continuing to work closely with boards and other organisations to ensure Scotland is prepared for any NHS staffing implications as a result of the pandemic.

“The extra resource former nurses and midwives can provide if the pandemic worsens will be vital, and that is why we are offering to meet any costs that re-registering will incur.”

Labour health spokesman Dr Richard Simpson said a second wave of swine flu could see GPs dealing with more than 5,000 extra cases a week. He said ministers must “step up their preparations”.

Source: http://www.hsj.co.uk/news/primary-care/swine-flu-former-nurses-urged-to-re-register/5006992.article
Copyright Health Service Journal Monday 5th October 2009


Chief executive of NHS urges AHPs to restructure the way care is delivered to patients

Allied health professionals have been urged to ‘simultaneously improve quality and productivity’ in order to meet the massive financial challenges currently facing the NHS.

Speaking at the Chief Health Professions Officer’s conference 2009, held in London on 6 and 7 October, David Nicholson, chief executive of the NHS, told AHPs that the scale of the challenge is to grow the NHS by 11 per cent over the next two years, without receiving any further funding from government.

Referring to Lord Darzi’s Next Stage Review, Mr Nicholson said: ‘We knew that, having been through 10 years where the NHS grew by a third or more, growth rates would become slower’. But he was keen to stress that ‘this is not about taking money away, but about using the money we have better’.

A whole series of drivers, including demographics, new technologies, and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommendations, will put increased pressure on the system, adding up to a shortfall of around £15-20 billion, he said. The big challenge is to recycle this within the system.

Despite making ‘the strongest case possible’ to government for more money, he said, ‘we know the cash is not there’. One option to deal with the challenge is for ‘slash and burn’, or arbitrary freezes, but ‘we know that this does not work and affects different parts of the service in an unplanned and unmanaged way’, he pointed out.

The biggest contribution to saving money and recycling it around the system will be the way AHPs restructure the way care is delivered to patients, he concluded. ‘Look at the evidence for productivity gains, they are all at the interfaces between services, in the places where patients get a “raw deal” with duplication,’ he declared.

‘Transforming services in those areas are key to unlocking quality of services and reducing costs.’

Admitting that this is not something that can be done from the top down, Mr Nicholson said the critical issue is leadership. ‘It requires people like you to accept the challenge’.

Source: http://www.cot.org.uk/homepage/news/?l=l&ListItemID=1078&ListGroupID=261
Copyright College of Occupational Therapists, Thursday 8th October 2009


Twitter could provide 'innovative solutions' for long-term conditions

Research by a Bournemouth University web professional suggests that social networking website Twitter could be an effective means of delivering improved quality of life to people suffering from long-term conditions.

The research, which looked at blogging and microblogging among practitioners, patients, and support groups has identified Twitter as a possible means of improving the personalised nature of health care delivery and support.

Author Andy Pulman, from Bournemouth University’s School of Health & Social Care, said that Twitter “could cultivate and inspire private, focused group conversations between people with chronic conditions and offer an effective targeted information channel for practitioners”.

Speaking about his paper, Pulman said: “Twitter has evolved beyond its basic functionality to provide a variety of alternate uses, some of which are health-related and which might offer opportunities in relation to improving health. I feel that the internet, mobile technology and web applications like Twitter are ideal candidates for providing innovative solutions to help deliver improved health-related quality of life. My ongoing research in this area aims to find out if this is the case.”

For more information on Twitter, please visit our Twitter page at http://www.twitter.com/OESHealthcare

Source: http://www.nursingtimes.net/nursing-practice-clinical-research/long-term-conditions/twitter-could-provide-innovative-solutions-for-long-term-conditions/5007223.article
Copyright Nursing Times, Sunday 11th October 2009


Why am I the short fat one?

My identical twin brother Chris is 2cm taller than me. Barely noticeable you would think. I can see what it is like to be him by standing on tip-toes just a little and frankly the world does not look much different from up there. Nonetheless it bothers me: I could have been that tall. I have exactly the same genes as my brother. Genes that, in the right environment, could have made me a full 185cm tall as opposed to my current 183cm. Something, somewhere went wrong and I got stunted. Not by much but it is a reminder of what could have been. And that is the real problem.
 
It is not the height, not that trousers fit him a little better or that he does not need to reach as far to change a light bulb. It is that I wonder how many other things I am missing out on. Ten points of IQ here, some grey hair there. Perhaps I will need glasses at age 35 instead of 40. Most people do not have any way of knowing whether or not they are getting the most out of their genes but if you have a twin sibling then you have an exact comparison. So how did these differences arise?
 
The differences between identical twins - people who should be exactly the same - are becoming increasingly useful to medical researchers interested in everything from mental illness to our ability to do maths.
 
Long term changes
 
Most people are used to thinking of our DNA as a fairly fixed code, a bit like a blueprint for a building. We know that some things can change the code itself - exposure to radiation can cause mutations that lead to an increased risk of cancer for example - but usually the code remains the same. However, production of the molecules for which our genes are responsible - things like digestive enzymes and muscle protein - is constantly getting switched on and off. And it seems that some environmental influences can have much more lasting effects - permanently activating or inactivating certain genes.
 
It is becoming apparent that this aspect of genetic control - a process dubbed epigenetics - is very important in human health. In 1944 there was a severe famine in Holland. The children born during this period are more susceptible to diabetes, obesity and heart disease compared to siblings who were older during the famine. It seems that the period of starvation prompted their bodies to switch certain genes on or off to cope with the lack of food. These changes may, in subsequent times of plenty, have made them gain weight and get diabetes.
 
This change in the particular genes we express is controlled chiefly through a process called "methylation" in which chemical groups are attached to the DNA molecule to tell the body whether or not to use the "methylated" genes. It is one of the ways in which our bodies' attempt to adapt to changing environments. Twins play a key role in discovering more. In the summer of 2009 Chris and I joined the twin research study at St Thomas's Hospital where we were investigated in great detail. They measured our height, weight, bone density, grip strength even ability to hear if a nursery rhyme is in tune. All these are traits that are to some extent genetic.
 
Other differences
 
It turned out that we are different in more ways than height. For a start I was 15kg heavier than my brother. Of the thousands of twins enrolled in the research program only 10 were more different in weight than us. Professor Tim Spector who leads the research unit was frank: "You're (he meant me) a disgrace." My excess weight, unlike my brother's excess height, is easily explained.  I have been living in America and eating too much. So far, no surprises.
 
But environmental exposure to a lot of cheap, high-fat food in America may have caused more than temporary weight gain. It may have permanently altered the way my genes are expressed. Scientists are only just beginning to understand these processes but it is possible that I may have permanently altered my metabolism to accommodate those extra pounds: the health effects could last a long time.
 
Key role in disease
 
Epigenetics seems to play a role in a large number of diseases. Twins studies show us that some cancers are not caused by DNA mutations but by epigenetic changes, which potentially offers new targets for drugs. Similarly with heart disease or diabetes we might one day be considering therapies that change our epigenetics. This is a long way off but twin studies are beginning to shed new light on how our bodies react to the environment.
What about my missing 20mm of height? It is probably an epigenetic effect caused by some long forgotten environmental difference when we were little. I will never get it back but if it is of use to medical science I can live without it.
 
Copyright BBC Health News – Wednesday 30th September 2009
 
Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8280431.stm                   
 


Time to get tougher on obesity?

One in three adults in the UK will be obese by 2012, according to UK researchers. Chris Oliver is an orthopaedic trauma surgeon in Edinburgh who had gastric band surgery to lose weight but believes it is not the solution for everyone. He thinks we all need an annual weight check and firmer treatment from our doctors to control our weight

'Morbid obesity'
 
Three years ago I could hardly climb up a flight of stairs - with a body mass index of over 53 and a weight of over 27 stone (171kg) I had become virtually immobile due to morbid obesity. The inability to lose weight and the realisation that obesity had ruined my life caused me to have an adjustable laparoscopic band surgical procedure early in 2007. I had unsuccessfully tried various diets but had failed to lose any significant weight. My morbid obesity had overtaken my life. I wrote a living will and went for it. As a surgeon I was well aware of the operative risks. You just know too much! After this surgical procedure I lost over ten stone (63.5kg)in weight and forced myself back to physical fitness. I realised that the band was a tool to help me change my life.
 
'Prejudice and discrimination'
 
Many people really do not understand obesity. There is a great deal of prejudice and unfair discrimination. Obesity is now one of the most significant health problems to affect the Western world. What was the inspiration to change? I obviously wanted to get fit again and be healthy but most of all after my weight loss surgery I realised that this was a second chance at life and that each day we live is so valuable. Much of my motivation came from an inspiration to do things I had done earlier in life and wanted to do again before it was too late.
 
'Risks'
 
Adjustable laparoscopic gastric band surgery is not the solution for all those that are obese, like all medical interventions, it has risks that must be carefully considered.
Patients presenting themselves for this kind of weight loss surgery must not have unrealistic expectations; they must learn to change their relationship with food and to have a new lifelong positive attitude to exercise. Early after my surgery I set myself a series of graduated targets: aquafit, swim, spin cycle, cardio gym, cycle, resistance gym, run, white-water kayaking, sprint triathlon, endurance cycling and who knows what next?
 
'Obesity epidemic'
 
However, I now believe that society must do much more to control the mass epidemic of obesity. Health care policy for obesity should make yearly annual checks on body mass index for children and adults freely available. Although annual weight checks could not be enforced, guidance and clear implications of being obese should be given much more directly and forcefully. More controlled weight loss programmes and the benefits of daily exercise must be made more acceptable. 
 
The current policies just seem too soft. If I had been weighed every year and had a rigorous health check I might have listened and not put on all that weight. We need to be much more proactive, in assessing obesity and its dire consequences on society. I really might have thought twice if my own weight had been checked on a regular annual basis.
 
Copyright BBC Health News – Wednesday 30th September 2009
 
Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8279577.stm


Private clinics face safety check

Safety checks are being carried out at all private clinics used to cut NHS waiting times in England after a man died during a routine operation. Dr John Hubley bled to death during a gall bladder operation at Eccleshill Treatment Centre in Bradford in 2007.  It subsequently emerged that there were no emergency blood supplies on site and key medical equipment was unavailable.  The Care Quality Commission, which regulates healthcare in England, is now looking into procedures at all clinics. 
 
The Department of Health said there was a robust system of checks and balances in place to ensure patient safety.  The private clinics that are being inspected are known as Independent Sector Treatment Centres and exclusively treat NHS patients as part of an initiative to reduce NHS waiting lists. At an inquest late last year it emerged that the Eccleshill Treatment Centre had been inspected by the Care Quality Commission's predecessor, the Healthcare Commission, five months before Dr Hubley died and cleared as "fit for purpose".  The coroner said the Healthcare Commission had missed major flaws in the clinic's emergency plan and described these flaws as "woefully inadequate".  During evidence the coroner described aspects of the clinic's plan to fetch blood in an emergency as "Mickey Mouse".
 
In a statement the Care Quality Commission said: "The death of Dr Hubley was an absolute tragedy.  "All those involved, including the regulator, should question what was done and ask whether they should do more to minimise the chances of recurrence.  "Our predecessor organisation, the Healthcare Commission, examined the situation closely.  "Having reviewed the regulatory action taken, important lessons have been identified for us to learn from.  In order to assure ourselves that the risk to patients is minimised, we are checking with all registered independent treatment centres that they have robust and appropriate systems in place.  No regulator can give a cast iron guarantee that such an incident will not happen again, or that all potential issues can be identified every time.  But we can promise to work tirelessly to protect the safety of patients, continuously asking how we might do better."
 
The Eccleshill Treatment Centre now has emergency blood and equipment on site and a coroner found that there were no continuing issues at the clinic arising from the death of Dr Hubley.  The clinic told Panorama that Dr Hubley's was the only death after 22,000 surgical procedures.  The Department of Health said the Independent Sector Treatment Programme had been a success and pointed to extremely high patient satisfaction rates.
In particular they claimed to have reduced the suffering of hundreds of thousands of patients who might otherwise have had to wait long periods for their operations.  It said patients could expect the same standard of care in Independent Sector Treatment Centres as in the NHS and there was a robust system of checks and balances in place to ensure patient safety.
 
Health minister Mike O'Brien told the BBC in a statement that Dr Hubley's death was "deeply regrettable".  "This incident was thoroughly investigated and new procedures have been put in place to reduce the chances of incidents like this happening again," he said.
 
Copyright BBC Health News – Wednesday 30th September 2009
 
Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8282147.stm
 



© OES Healthcare Recruitment 2010 Website powered by eBoss Online Recruitment Software